Evaluating adaptation progress on LDCs
in 3 days
in 3 days
Brief
Data collection was a major time-consuming process, with low standardisation and updates relying on manual input, lead to lack of transparency on the progress of National Adaptation Plans.
How might we bring transparency to adaptation progress?
Process:
Analyzed organizational structure and responsibilities.
Mapped existing data collection processes and identified bottlenecks.
Conducted interviews to uncover primary user needs, particularly for country parties seeking National Adaptation Plan information.
Ideated and prototyped solutions using open-source tools to ensure continuity, transparency, and replicability.
Tested solutions with users to ensure information accessibility.
Measured and evaluated productivity improvements.
Outcome
Creation of user accounts with corresponding secure database for access.
Standardised and easy-to-update data collection sheet.
Interactive data dashboard that syncs to data collection sheet and project funding databases (GCF, AF, GEF).
Development of NAP Central Website as Repository for NAPs and related resources.
Insights
Hacking bureacratic processes with open-source tools
While they can have some limitations, open-source tools offer many advantages:
Allow UNFCCC to not depend on funds disbursement
Allow to iterate quickly
Allow for others to use the code and
Insights
Balancing multiple users and priorities
Data-collection was made external and internally.
Which also required the standarization to be flexible to cover the main user groups each with varied levels of knowledge regarding NAPs.
Insights
Less time for data collection and cleaning equals more time for drafting insights
Automating those data-collection processes that could be automated allowed us to spend more time for visualising more complex pieces of information that were published through reports.